Broad Institute-MIT team identifies highly efficient new Cas9 for in vivo genome editing

A collaborative study between researchers from the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and the National Center for Biotechnology Information of the National Institutes of Health (NIH-NCBI) has identified a highly efficient Cas9 nuclease that overcomes one of the primary challenges to in vivo genome editing. This finding, published today in Nature, is expected to help make the CRISPR toolbox accessible for in vivo experimental and therapeutic applications.

Originally discovered in bacteria, the CRISPR-Cas9 system enables the cutting of DNA as a defense mechanism against viral infection. Although numerous microbial species possess this system, the Cas9 enzyme from Streptococcus pyogenes (SpCas9) was the first to be engineered for altering the DNA of higher organisms, and has since emerged as the basis for a series of highly versatile genome modification technologies.

Smaller packaging

In order to perturb genes in adult animals, key components of the CRISPR-Cas9 system must be introduced into cells using delivery vehicles known as vectors. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is considered one of the most promising candidate vectors, as it is not known to cause human disease and has already gained clinical regulatory approval in Europe. However, the small cargo capacity of AAV makes it challenging to package both the SpCas9 enzyme and the other components required for gene editing into a single viral particle.

The Cas9 nuclease from the bacteria Staphylococcus aureus (SaCas9), presented in this new work, is 25% smaller than SpCas9, offering a solution to the AAV packaging problem.

The Broad/MIT team, led by Feng Zhang, core member of the Broad Institute and investigator at the McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT, along with collaborators at MIT, led by MIT Institute Professor Phillip Sharp, and the NCBI led by Eugene Koonin, set out to identify smaller Cas9 enzymes that could replicate the efficiency of the current SpCas9 system, while allowing packaging into delivery vehicles such as AAV. The researchers began by using comparative genomics to analyze Cas9s from more than 600 different types of bacteria, selecting six smaller enzymes for further study.

“Sifting through the 600 or so available Cas9 sequences, we identified a group of small variants in which the enzymatic domains were intact whereas the non-enzymatic portion was substantially truncated,” said Eugene Koonin, senior investigator with the NCBI and a contributing author of the study. “Luckily, one of these smaller Cas9 proteins turned out to be suitable for the development of the methodology described in this paper. We are now actively exploring the diversity of Cas9 proteins and their relatives in the hope to find new varieties that could potentially lead to even more powerful tools.”

After rigorous testing, only the Cas9 from S. aureus demonstrated DNA cutting efficiency comparable to that of SpCas9 in mammalian cells. The team then used a method known as BLESS, previously developed by Nicola Crosetto of the Karolinska Institute and Ivan Dikic at the Goethe University Medical School, to determine the presence of unintended “off-targets” across the entire genomic space. Again, SaCas9 and SpCas9 demonstrated comparable DNA targeting accuracy.

The team demonstrated the power of in vivo gene editing with AAV/SaCas9-mediated targeting of PCSK9, a promising drug target. The loss of PCSK9 in humans has been associated with the reduced risk of cardiovascular disease and lower levels of LDL cholesterol. In a mouse model, the team observed almost complete depletion of PCKS9 in the blood one week after administration of AAV/SaCas9 and a 40% decrease in total cholesterol. The mice showed no overt signs of inflammation or immune response.

“While we have chosen a therapeutically relevant target, PCSK9, in this proof-of-principle study, the greater goal here is the development of a versatile and efficient system that expands our ability to edit genomes in vivo,” said Fei Ann Ran, co-first author of the study, along with Le Cong and Winston Yan.

More broadly, SaCas9 is expected improve scientists’ ability to screen for the effects of mutations and better understand gene function using animal models. In the future, it may also be engineered to allow the targeted control of gene expression, which can be employed to expand our understanding of transcriptional and epigenetic regulation in the cell.

The next step, says senior author Feng Zhang, is to compare and contrast the two Cas9s in the hope of recognizing ways to further optimize the system.

“This study highlights the power of using comparative genome analysis to expand the CRISPR-Cas9 toolbox,” said Zhang. “Our long-term goal is to develop CRISPR as a therapeutic platform. This new Cas9 provides a scaffold to expand our Cas9 repertoire, and help us create better models of disease, identify mechanisms, and develop new treatments.”

About the engineered CRISPR-Cas9 system

CRISPRs (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) have recently been harnessed as genome editing tools in a wide range of species. The engineered CRISPR-Cas9 system allows researchers to mutate or change the expression of genes in living cells, including those of humans. The family of Cas9 nucleases (also known as Cas5, Csn1, or Csx12) recognizes DNA targets in complex with RNA guides. Researchers can now harness the engineered system to home in on specific nucleic acid sequences and cut the DNA at those precise targets. The cuts modify the activity of the targeted genes, allowing researchers to study the genes’ function.

2015 Scolnick Prize Lecture: Dr. Charles Gilbert

Dr. Charles Gilbert of The Rockefeller University delivers the annual Scolnick Prize Lecture on Friday, March 20, 2015. Charles Gilbert has been a pioneer in understanding the function of visual cortex. His work addresses fundamental questions about visual perception, and has also provided important insights into how the brain recovers from injury and degenerative disease.

2015 McGovern Institute Spring Symposium

Theories of motor control have advanced the idea that the brain uses internal models to generate reliable motor commands and predict the sensory consequences of those commands. More recently, the concept of internal models has been used to formalize the computations that bear on cognitive control in an uncertain and dynamic environment. In this symposium, we will explore the recent advances in the study of internal models in perception, cognition and action, and discuss the extent to which they reveal the common computational principles across neural circuits and behaviors.

DATE: Monday April 27, 2017
TIME: 8:30am – 5:30pm
LOCATION: MIT Bldg 46-3002 (Singleton Auditorium)
QUESTIONS? Laura Halligan | laurahal@mit.edu | 617.715.5396

 

REGISTRATION IS NOW CLOSED

****

2015 Spring Symposium

 

***

8:30 am CONTINENTAL BREAKFAST IN ATRIUM

8:45 – 9:00 am ROBERT DESIMONE & MEHRDAD JAZAYERI, McGovern Institute
Welcoming Remarks

SESSION I Chair: Mark Harnett

9:00 – 9:35 am NATE SAWTELL, Columbia University
Internal model mechanisms in cerebellar circuitry: Insights from electric fish

9:35 – 10:10 am THOMAS JESSELL, Columbia University
Circuits for fast and flexible motor control

10:10 – 10:45 am RICHARD MOONEY, Duke University
Motor – auditory interactions in mice and songbirds

10:45– 11:05 am BREAK

11:05 – 11:40 am KATHLEEN CULLEN, McGill University
Neural correlates of sensory prediction errors: Evidence for internal models of voluntary self-motion in the primate cerebellum

11:40 – 12:15 pm BYRON YU, Carnegie Mellon University
Internal models for interpreting neural population activity during sensori-motor control

12:15 – 1:30 pm POSTER SESSION AND LUNCH

SESSION II Chair: Rebecca Saxe

1:30 – 2:05 pm MARC SOMMER, Duke University
Neuronal circuits for seeing while moving

2:05 – 2:40 pm JÖRN DIEDRICHSEN, University College London
Recalibration or learning de-novo? When to abandon an internal model

2:40 – 3:15 pm AMY BASTIAN, Kennedy Krieger Institute
Cerebellar contributions to moving, sensing and learning

3:15 – 3:35 pm BREAK

3:35 – 4:10 pm DANIEL WOLPERT, University of Cambridge
Internal models for sensorimotor control and decision making

4:10 – 4:45 pm JOSH TENENBAUM, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
The game engine in your head: Modeling common sense-scene understanding with probabilistic programs

4:45 – 5:45 pm PANEL DISCUSSION
Thomas Jessell, Kathleen Cullen, Daniel Wolpert, Josh Tenenbaum

5:45 pm RECEPTION AND POSTER SESSION IN ATRIUM

 

2015 Sharp Lecture in Neural Circuits: Dr. Cornelia Bargmann

Dr. Cornelia “Cori” Bargmann of The Rockefeller University delivered the fourth annual Sharp Lecture in Neural Circuits on Tuesday, March 2, 2015. Bargmann studies how genes, experience and neural circuits influence behavior in the nematode worm C. elegans.

McGovern Institute awards prize to vision scientist Charles Gilbert

The McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT announced today that Charles D. Gilbert of The Rockefeller University is the winner of the 2015 Edward M. Scolnick Prize in Neuroscience. The Prize is awarded annually by the McGovern Institute to recognize outstanding advances in any field of neuroscience.

“Charles Gilbert has been a pioneer in understanding the function of visual cortex,” says Robert Desimone, director of the McGovern Institute and chair of the selection committee. “His work addresses fundamental questions about visual perception, and has also provided important insights into how the brain recovers from injury and degenerative disease.”

Gilbert is currently the Arthur and Janet Ross Professor and head of the laboratory of neurobiology at The Rockefeller University. He received his MD and PhD from Harvard University, where he later became an assistant professor before joining the Rockefeller faculty in 1983. He was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2001 and to the National Academy of Sciences in 2006.

While at Harvard, Gilbert began a longstanding collaboration with Torsten Wiesel, who shared the 1981 Nobel Prize for his work with David Hubel on the function of the visual cortex. Together with Wiesel, Gilbert described the lateral neuronal connections within the cortex, which are central to our current understanding of cortical function. The primary visual cortex contains a topographic map of the visual field that is transmitted from the retina, with each neuron responding to stimuli at a particular location in visual space, known as its receptive field. But as Gilbert’s work revealed, the cortex also contains an extensive network of lateral connections that allow neurons to respond not just to the stimuli in their primary receptive fields, but also to contextual information from other parts of the image. This is central to our ability to perceive large-scale features within the clutter of natural visual scenes.

Gilbert went on on to discover that these horizontal connections play an important role in the brain’s plasticity. If a blind patch is created on retina, the corresponding patch of cortex is initially unresponsive, but soon begins to respond to stimuli delivered to the surrounding part of the visual field, causing us to be unaware of any perceptual gap. Gilbert discovered the mechanism underlying this form of plasticity, demonstrating the anatomical growth of horizontal connections within the previously inactive patch of cortex and describing the intricate changes in connectivity that follow. These studies focused on the visual cortex, but similar circuits and mechanisms are thought to exist throughout the brain, and to underlie its ability to recover after damage or disease.

The plasticity of these horizontal connections is important not only for recovery after injury, but also for perceptual learning, a form of brain plasticity that persists throughout life. It has long been recognized that visual perceptual abilities (for example, the ability to do perceptual grouping of scene components) can improve with practice, and Gilbert has studied the neural basis of this phenomenon. He identified changes in the functional properties of cortical neurons that correlate with perceptual learning, and showed that these changes are seen only during the performance of the specific learned task, indicating that they are controlled by top-down influences such as attention and expectation that depend on behavioral context. This work has led to a new view of cortical neurons as ‘adaptive processors’ that can select task-relevant inputs through an interaction between top-down signals and local cortical connections.

The McGovern Institute will award the Scolnick Prize to Dr Gilbert on Friday March 20, 2015. At 4.00 pm he will deliver a lecture entitled “The Dynamic Brain,” to be followed by a reception, at the McGovern Institute in the Brain and Cognitive Sciences Complex, 43 Vassar Street (Building 46, Room 3002) in Cambridge. The event is free and open to the public.

2015scolnickFINAL700x900

About the Edward M. Scolnick Prize in Neuroscience:
The Scolnick Prize, awarded annually by the McGovern Institute, is named in honor of Dr. Edward M. Scolnick, who stepped down as President of Merck Research Laboratories in December 2002 after holding Merck’s top research post for 17 years. Dr. Scolnick is now a core member of the Broad Institute, where he is chief scientist at the Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research. He also serves as a member of the McGovern Institute’s governing board. The prize, which is endowed through a gift from Merck to the McGovern Institute, consists of a $100,000 award, plus an inscribed gift. Previous winners are Huda Zoghbi (Baylor College of Medicine), Thomas Jessell (Columbia University), Roger Nicoll (University of California, San Francisco), Bruce McEwen (Rockefeller University), Lily and Yuh-Nung Jan (University of California, San Francisco), Jeremy Nathans (Johns Hopkins University), Michael Davis (Emory University), David Julius (University of California, San Francisco), Michael Greenberg (Harvard Medical School), Judith Rapoport (National Institute of Mental Health) and Mark Konishi (California Institute of Technology).